CUNA Regulatory Comment Call
February 14, 2005
Agency Review to Reduce the Burden of Consumer Protection Rules
(Not a Major Rule)
- The NCUA Board has issued a request for comments to identify outdated, unnecessary, or burdensome regulatory requirements imposed on federally insured credit unions. NCUA and the other federal financial institution regulators are required by a 1996 law, the Economic Growth and Regulatory Paperwork Reduction Act (EGRPRA), to review their rules at least once every ten years.
- EGRPRA requires the regulators to categorize the rules, publish the categories for comment, report to Congress on any significant issues raised by the comments, and eliminate unnecessary rules. NCUA will request comments on certain categories of rules every six months between 2003 and 2006. The regulators are now requesting comments with regard to safety and soundness and anti-money laundering rules.
- Comments are due by May 5, 2005. Please submit your comments to CUNA by April 25, 2005.
Please feel free to fax your responses to CUNA at 202-638-7052; e-mail them to Associate General Counsel Mary Dunn at email@example.com and to Assistant General Counsel Lilly Thomas at firstname.lastname@example.org; or mail them to Mary and Jeff in c/o CUNAs Regulatory Advocacy Department, 601 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, South Building, Suite 600, Washington, DC 20004-2601. You may also contact us at 800-356-9655, ext. 6732, if you would like a copy of the request for comments, or you may access them here.
NCUA and the other federal financial institution regulators are required by EGRPRA to review their rules at least once every ten years. EGRPRA requires the regulators to categorize the rules, publish the categories for comment, report to Congress on any significant issues raised by the comments, and eliminate unnecessary rules. NCUA will request comments on certain categories of rules every six months between 2003 and 2006.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
The NCUA Board has issued a request for comments to identify outdated, unnecessary, or burdensome regulatory requirements imposed on federally insured credit unions. Because the credit union system differs from the banking system, NCUA will publish its notices separately but maintain comparability with the other regulators to the extent the issues are the same. The EGRPRA review supplements and complements the regulatory review that NCUA conducts under other laws and its internal policies.
NCUA will seek comments on a number of categories of rules between now and 2006. NCUA and the other regulators are now seeking comments on the following safety and soundness and anti-money laundering rules:
- Lending 12 CFR 701.21
- Investments 12 CFR Part 703
- Supervisory Committee Audits and Verifications 12 CFR Part 715
- Security Programs 12 CFR 748.0
- Guidelines for Safeguarding Member Information - 12 CFR 748, Appendix A
- Records Preservation Program and Record Retention Index 12 CFR Part 749
- Appraisals 12 CFR Part 722
- Examination 12 CFR 741.1
- Rules Applying to Federally-insured State-Chartered Credit Unions 12 CFR Part 741, Subpart B.
- Report of Crimes or Suspected Crimes 12 CFR 748.1(c)
- Bank Secrecy Act 12 CFR 748.2
NCUA encourages all comments with regard to these rules. Specifically, comments are encouraged with regard to the following issues:
- Whether statutory changes are needed.
- Whether the rules contain requirements that are not needed to serve the purposes of the statutes they implement.
- The extent to which the rules may adversely affect competition.
- The cost of compliance with regard to reporting, recordkeeping, and disclosure requirements, particularly on small credit unions (those with less than $10 million in assets).
- Whether any regulatory requirements are inconsistent or redundant.
- Whether any of these rules are unclear.
In addition to comments on individual rules and requirements, NCUA also encourages comments that pertain to product lines. This should be helpful in exposing redundant and potentially inconsistent regulatory requirements and Comments on such product lines may also include recommendations about rules that are not included in the current request for comments.
At the conclusion of the comment period, NCUA and the other regulators will review the comments received and will consider proposing amendments to these rules. Comments that may also require statutory changes are also encouraged. A report will be submitted to Congress discussing the issues raised in the comments and whether they must be addressed by legislative or regulatory changes.
QUESTIONS TO CONSIDER REGARDING THE REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
(NCUA Specifically Requests Comments on the Following Issues)
- Do any statutory requirements underlying these rules impose redundant, conflicting,
or unduly burdensome requirements? Are there less burdensome alternatives?
- Are these rules consistent with the purposes of the statutes that they implement?
Have circumstances changed so that any of these rules are no longer necessary? Do changes
in financial products and services offered to consumers suggest a need to revise certain
rules or statutes? Do any of the rules impose compliance burdens not required by the
statutes they implement?
- Would a different general approach to regulating achieve statutory goals with fewer
burdens? Do any of these rules, or the statutes they derive from, impose inflexible
- Do any of these rules or statutes create competitive disadvantages for credit unions
as compared to other sectors of the financial services industry?
- Do any of these rules, or the statutes they derive from, impose particularly burdensome
reporting, recordkeeping, or disclosure requirements? Are any of these requirements similar
enough in purpose and use so that they could be consolidated? Which of these requirements
could be fulfilled electronically in order to reduce burden? Are any of the reporting or
recordkeeping requirements unnecessary to demonstrate compliance with the law?
- Do any of these rules impose inconsistent or redundant regulatory requirements that
are not warranted by the purposes of the rule?
- Are the rules drafted in clear and easily understood language?
- How can these rules be changed to minimize any significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small credit unions (defined as those with less than $10 million
- Other comments?
Eric Richard General Counsel (202) 508-6742 email@example.com |
Mary Mitchell Dunn SVP & Associate General Counsel (202) 508-6736 firstname.lastname@example.org
Jeffrey Bloch Assistant General Counsel (202) 508-6732 email@example.com
Lilly Thomas Assistant General Counsel (202) 508-6733 firstname.lastname@example.org
Catherine Orr Senior Regulatory Counsel (202) 508-6743 email@example.com