CUNA Regulatory Comment Call


August 4, 2005

Post-Employment Restrictions for Certain NCUA Examiners

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

QUESTIONS REGARDING THE PROPOSAL

  1. Do you agree with the definition of senior examiner as set forth in the proposal (is it too broad or too narrow)?

    Yes ___ No___

    If no, how would you define senior examiner differently?
















  2. Do you agree with the duration of the prohibition period -- one year after leaving NCUA employment?

    Yes ___ No___

    If no, what length of time do you feel would be appropriate?
















  3. Is the meaning of consultant sufficiently clear in the proposal?

    Yes ___ No___

    If no, how should the definition be worded to make it clearer?
















  4. Are there other terms in the proposal that need to be defined?

    Yes ___ No___

    If yes, what are those terms and how should they be defined?
















  5. Other comments?
















Eric Richard • General Counsel • (202) 508-6742 • erichard@cuna.com
Mary Mitchell Dunn • SVP & Associate General Counsel • (202) 508-6736 • mdunn@cuna.com
Jeffrey Bloch • Assistant General Counsel • (202) 508-6732 • jbloch@cuna.com
Lilly Thomas • Assistant General Counsel • (202) 508-6733 • lthomas@cuna.com
Catherine Orr • Senior Regulatory Counsel • (202) 508-6743 • corr@cuna.com