CUNA Regulatory Comment Call

August 4, 2005

Post-Employment Restrictions for Certain NCUA Examiners



  1. Do you agree with the definition of senior examiner as set forth in the proposal (is it too broad or too narrow)?

    Yes ___ No___

    If no, how would you define senior examiner differently?

  2. Do you agree with the duration of the prohibition period -- one year after leaving NCUA employment?

    Yes ___ No___

    If no, what length of time do you feel would be appropriate?

  3. Is the meaning of consultant sufficiently clear in the proposal?

    Yes ___ No___

    If no, how should the definition be worded to make it clearer?

  4. Are there other terms in the proposal that need to be defined?

    Yes ___ No___

    If yes, what are those terms and how should they be defined?

  5. Other comments?

Eric Richard • General Counsel • (202) 508-6742 •
Mary Mitchell Dunn • SVP & Associate General Counsel • (202) 508-6736 •
Jeffrey Bloch • Assistant General Counsel • (202) 508-6732 •
Lilly Thomas • Assistant General Counsel • (202) 508-6733 •
Catherine Orr • Senior Regulatory Counsel • (202) 508-6743 •