CUNA Regulatory Comment Call

November 6, 2000

IRS Third-Party Payment Rules

(Not a Major Rule)


Comments on the proposed rules are due by January 17, 2001. Please submit your comments to CUNA by January 11, 2000. A hearing on this issue is also scheduled for February 7, 2001. Please feel free to fax your responses to CUNA at 202-371-8240; e-mail them to Associate General Counsel Mary Dunn at or to Assistant General Counsel Jeffrey Bloch at; or mail them to Mary or Jeff in c/o CUNA's Regulatory Advocacy Department, 805 15th Street, NW, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20005. You may also contact us if you would like a copy of the proposed rules.


The Internal Revenue Code requires that those engaged in a trade or business must report the amount of a payment if it is $600 or more and must report the name and address of the recipient. The party responsible for reporting this information must also withhold tax under certain circumstances, such as when the recipient has failed to provide a valid taxpayer identification number.

The proposed rules are intended to clarify these Form 1099 information reporting requirements for financial institutions, brokers, and others involved in three-party payments. Third-party payments include, for example, payments that a financial institution may make to a contractor on behalf of the borrower.


The proposed rules will require that a party making the payment on behalf of another must report the payment under one of the following circumstances:

The significant difference between the proposed rules and the current rules is that under current rules, a financial institution is not subject to the reporting requirements if it collects and makes payments on an "infrequent and isolated basis." Under the proposed rules, a financial institution would be subject to the reporting requirements under such circumstances if it performs a management or oversight function in connection with the payment.

The proposed rules will preserve the current exception of allowing the option for those making payments to designate a paying agent to file information returns and backup withholdings. The proposed rules will also include examples, derived primarily from revenue rulings and private letter rulings. These rulings will then become obsolete to the extent that they are factually encompassed by these proposed rules. These obsolete rulings include IRS Revenue Rulings 93-70, 85-50, 77-53, 73- 232, 70-608, 69-595, 67-197, 65-129, 64-36, 59-328, 55-606, and 54-571.

Here are the other changes outlined in the proposed rules:

Payments to Joint Payees - The proposed rules provide that a payment made jointly to two or more payees may be considered fixed and determinable income for one payee even if it is not fixed and determinable for another payee.

Reported Amount When Fees, Expenses, or Commissions are Deducted From a Payment - The proposed rules clarify that the amount to be reported as paid to another person is the gross amount of the payment before fees, expenses, or commissions have been deducted. The person that is paid is generally responsible for these expenses and would be subject to the reporting requirements.


Eric Richard • General Counsel • (202) 508-6742 •

Mary Mitchell Dunn • SVP & Associate General Counsel • (202) 508-6736 •

Jeffrey Bloch • Assistant General Counsel • (202) 508-6732 •

Catherine Orr • Senior Regulatory Counsel • (202) 508-6743 •